Information System
Q. 1: What is the role of CRM in challenging economy?
What is CRM?
It is based around a few premises on customers:
New customers are expensive to capture (estimates put the cost at as much as ten times the cost of a retained customer) and take time to deliver value Lost customers tell many others about their experiences and rarely come back Retained customers are better value and in time move from being clients to becoming advocates working on your behalf Your major efforts should be spent on excellent customers or groups of customers - i.e. those that are likely to yield good returns.
Catalysis plays a dominant role in industrial chemical manufacturing. Complementary research in academic laboratories can be instrumental in initiating technology breakthroughs.
The importance of catalysis to the chemical industry is enormous. An estimated 90 per cent of chemical production processes are based on catalytic technologies
Encompassing four major market sectors: fuel refining, polymerization, chemical production, and environmental remediation. The worldwide market for solid catalysts in on the order of US $2 billion annually and the total value of fuels and chemicals derived by catalysis is close to US $900 billion
Reasons for the widespread use of catalysis are both economically and environmentally compelling: catalytic processes have, as a role, lower operating costs and yield higher purity products with fewer side-products (hence fewer environmental hazards) compared to non-catalytic processes
The strategic importance of catalysis to modern industrialized economies has been affirmed by several of Canada 's international competitors. The US , Britain , the Netherlands and Germany have recently created national R&D programs to foster innovation in catalysis and the transfer of technology from academic research laboratories to industry. Catalysis is considered to be the key to the high value-added products which create the positive balance of trade for the US chemical industry
In contrast, the Canadian chemical industry posts a net trade deficit (US $10 billion in exports vs. US $15 billion imports in 1997)
However, major growth areas for Serendipity and Design in Catalyst Discovery
The earliest recognition of a catalytic phenomenon is credited to Sir Humphrey Davy, who reported, in the early 19th century, the incandescence of metals in contact with mixtures of air and combustible gases. Shortly after, J.J. Berzelius described "a new power, hitherto unknown, common both in organic and inorganic nature ... I shall ... call it catalytic power. I shall also call catalysis the decomposition of bodies by this force." Berzelius' idea of catalytic force recalls the "Vital Force" of the alchemists, who deemed a trace amount of an essential substance necessary to effect the transformation of a much larger quantity of base lead into gold.
Q;2 Why Many CRM initiatives, however, fail to deliver the expected benefits?
Three big reasons CRM initiatives fail
CRM failure rates have remained high during the last ten years, indicating that many organizations don’t receive full benefit from their CRM initiatives. Let’s examine important reasons for this unfortunate situation.
Although relatively few projects become complete write-offs, partial failure is common. Most often, a project delivers some expected benefit, but still leaves users unsatisfied and business sponsors wondering what went wrong.
This list describes three major pitfalls that plague many CRM initiatives. While not a comprehensive inventory of potential problems, many projects succumb to these big causes of failure.
Failure 1: Installing technology without a business strategy.
Many organizations fall into the trap of deploying tools and technology without creating a proper CRM-related business strategy.
For most organizations, customer relationships involve a range of interactions that together achieve (hopefully) positive results. Creating and executing a business strategy is difficult because CRM initiatives typically involve numerous components and moving parts.
This list describes three major pitfalls that plague many CRM initiatives. While not a comprehensive inventory of potential problems, many projects succumb to these big causes of failure.
Failure 1: Installing technology without a business strategy.
Many organizations fall into the trap of deploying tools and technology without creating a proper CRM-related business strategy.
For most organizations, customer relationships involve a range of interactions that together achieve (hopefully) positive results. Creating and executing a business strategy is difficult because CRM initiatives typically involve numerous components and moving parts.
A Gartner research document describes the importance of strategy:
A unified CRM strategy is absolutely critical to CRM success, but developing and implementing such a strategy is a complex, difficult and intensely political process.
A unified CRM strategy is absolutely critical to CRM success, but developing and implementing such a strategy is a complex, difficult and intensely political process.
Baseline magazine discusses the wide-ranging impact a full CRM strategy can have across an organization and its customer ecosystem:
[A] root cause of CRM failure is looking at the projects as software deployments when, in order to take full advantage of the systems’ capabilities, a substantial reorganization must be performed on virtually every operation touching customers.
A somewhat cryptic comment from Marketing Management magazine makes a similar point:
CRM mandates a synergistic combination of inter-departmentally construed strategies, programs, and processes. It is the weakest link in this combination that will determine the ultimate success or failure of CRM.
[A] root cause of CRM failure is looking at the projects as software deployments when, in order to take full advantage of the systems’ capabilities, a substantial reorganization must be performed on virtually every operation touching customers.
A somewhat cryptic comment from Marketing Management magazine makes a similar point:
CRM mandates a synergistic combination of inter-departmentally construed strategies, programs, and processes. It is the weakest link in this combination that will determine the ultimate success or failure of CRM.
In other words, successful CRM initiatives focus on business objectives and use technology as a support to help reach those goals.
Think about CRM as a business strategy to help you organize plans and activities around better serving customers; although technology can help, it’s not the goal. Forget this lesson at your peril.
Think about CRM as a business strategy to help you organize plans and activities around better serving customers; although technology can help, it’s not the goal. Forget this lesson at your peril.
Failure 2: Paying insufficient attention to user needs and benefits.
Engaging users is critical to the success of any enterprise software deployment, but particularly so in the case of CRM, where users can sometimes sidestep the technology and still accomplish their job function.
Engaging users is critical to the success of any enterprise software deployment, but particularly so in the case of CRM, where users can sometimes sidestep the technology and still accomplish their job function.
A research note from AMR Research explains why this aspect of CRM is different from other enterprise software categories:
In applications such as ERP, supply chain, or financial management applications, the users have much less flexibility or choice in whether or not to adopt an enterprise application standard. And when was the last time you heard someone question why financials were implemented?
A quick search reveals that many observers believe poor user adoption is a key driver of failed CRM projects. In a Search CRM interview, Sugar CRM’s former CEO, John Roberts, links adoption to end-user perception of value (emphasis added):
In a lot of cases, companies deploy CRM, and there’s a lot of euphoria over it for the first couple of months. Then, people stop using it. They look at it as ‘Big Brother’ watching them. CRM is sold as a tool to make an organization more effective and efficient; but the end user doesn’t see CRM as making them more efficient and effective.
In applications such as ERP, supply chain, or financial management applications, the users have much less flexibility or choice in whether or not to adopt an enterprise application standard. And when was the last time you heard someone question why financials were implemented?
A quick search reveals that many observers believe poor user adoption is a key driver of failed CRM projects. In a Search CRM interview, Sugar CRM’s former CEO, John Roberts, links adoption to end-user perception of value (emphasis added):
In a lot of cases, companies deploy CRM, and there’s a lot of euphoria over it for the first couple of months. Then, people stop using it. They look at it as ‘Big Brother’ watching them. CRM is sold as a tool to make an organization more effective and efficient; but the end user doesn’t see CRM as making them more efficient and effective.
In my view, poor user adoption is not the direct cause of CRM project failure. Rather, it’s a symptom the organization has not anticipated obstacles that may interfere with users embracing the new system.
Adoption may lag for many reasons, including:
(1)Software that is complicated or difficult to use
(2)Sales people that don’t see adequate value in the new system
(3)Poor communication of benefits to users
Get users to adopt a new CRM system by focusing on the WIFM (What’s In It For Me) factor. I asked independent analyst, Erin Kinikin, for her thoughts on engaging users:
The sales person is quarterback for the customer team. Give the sales people good reasons to login and use the system. If the sales person feels the system saves time, makes money, or helps ‘keep score’, he or she will be much more likely to use the system — and enter customer data.
The sales person is quarterback for the customer team. Give the sales people good reasons to login and use the system. If the sales person feels the system saves time, makes money, or helps ‘keep score’, he or she will be much more likely to use the system — and enter customer data.
One banker involved with CRM efforts told me:
Frontline users, particularly the most effective “top-producers,” will adopt the system only on the basis of real or perceived value.
Frontline users, particularly the most effective “top-producers,” will adopt the system only on the basis of real or perceived value.
Engage users early and often during the system planning and implementation phases, so they understand what’s in it for them. When users do not adopt a system as planned, seek their honest feedback on how to make it more usable, helpful, and valuable.
Failure 3: Using ambiguous (or non-existent) measures of project completion and success.
Successful CRM projects are rooted in a clear trajectory aimed at achieving specific goals and objectives. Projects without concrete goals and a plan to measure both progress and results are distinct candidates for failure.
During a phone conversation, longtime Gartner CRM analyst, Gareth Herschel, described this issue succinctly:
One of the most common reasons for CRM failure is starting a project without first establishing a clear definition of success.
To solve the problem, articulate specific goals and create a targeted measurement plan designed around your organization’s business objectives. Paying attention to the right metrics can help ensure your project produces the results you seek.
I asked independent analyst, Erin Kinikin, to describe the importance of measurement:
If CRM is the ultimate destination, the measurement plan is what tells you where you are now and points to where to go next. For example, it’s not enough to decide to increase sales. Using a measurement plan, concrete metrics — such as number and quality of sales leads, lead freshness, cycle time and win/loss rates by sales stage, and repurchase or up sell rates — can help assess current strengths and weaknesses, measure CRM gains, and identify areas for further improvement. Doing CRM without metrics is like driving without a roadmap — who knows where you’ll end up?
Successful CRM projects are rooted in a clear trajectory aimed at achieving specific goals and objectives. Projects without concrete goals and a plan to measure both progress and results are distinct candidates for failure.
During a phone conversation, longtime Gartner CRM analyst, Gareth Herschel, described this issue succinctly:
One of the most common reasons for CRM failure is starting a project without first establishing a clear definition of success.
To solve the problem, articulate specific goals and create a targeted measurement plan designed around your organization’s business objectives. Paying attention to the right metrics can help ensure your project produces the results you seek.
I asked independent analyst, Erin Kinikin, to describe the importance of measurement:
If CRM is the ultimate destination, the measurement plan is what tells you where you are now and points to where to go next. For example, it’s not enough to decide to increase sales. Using a measurement plan, concrete metrics — such as number and quality of sales leads, lead freshness, cycle time and win/loss rates by sales stage, and repurchase or up sell rates — can help assess current strengths and weaknesses, measure CRM gains, and identify areas for further improvement. Doing CRM without metrics is like driving without a roadmap — who knows where you’ll end up?
Forrester CRM and customer service analyst, Natalie Petouhoff, is an expert on using metrics to align technology initiatives with business goals. She commented via email:
You get what you measure.
Although the analytical part of CRM offers the real gold, most companies have barely deployed “operational” CRM, which is a functional, relational database to keep track of customer information.
These organizations are just not prepared to handle all the issues related to legacy systems, reworked business processes, management expectations, organizational change management, and so on. They get bogged down trying to deploy operational CRM so the analytics never get implemented.
Without measuring, how can you know whether the business case used to sell the value proposition actually achieves results? This obvious point has somehow eluded most companies.
Organizations should measure changes in business results arising from major software deployments. Fiduciary responsibility demands senior management report this information to the Board of Directors.
Aside from IT, can any other part of an organization spend millions and not be held accountable for the results?
You get what you measure.
Although the analytical part of CRM offers the real gold, most companies have barely deployed “operational” CRM, which is a functional, relational database to keep track of customer information.
These organizations are just not prepared to handle all the issues related to legacy systems, reworked business processes, management expectations, organizational change management, and so on. They get bogged down trying to deploy operational CRM so the analytics never get implemented.
Without measuring, how can you know whether the business case used to sell the value proposition actually achieves results? This obvious point has somehow eluded most companies.
Organizations should measure changes in business results arising from major software deployments. Fiduciary responsibility demands senior management report this information to the Board of Directors.
Aside from IT, can any other part of an organization spend millions and not be held accountable for the results?
Use metrics to drive results that support your business goals. In the absence of metrics, expensive CRM initiatives can drift into failure without ever delivering meaningful benefit.
During an irreverent phone conversation, CRM legend and fellow ZDNet blogger, Paul Greenberg, summarized the fundamental reason many projects don’t perform as expected:
Companies expect to be the center of attention, but successful CRM depends on listening and understanding the customer. Sadly, most companies are pretty stupid about this stuff.
My take. CRM success arises from listening to customers, considering the needs of end users, and not substituting technology deployments for well-considered business goals.
Companies expect to be the center of attention, but successful CRM depends on listening and understanding the customer. Sadly, most companies are pretty stupid about this stuff.
My take. CRM success arises from listening to customers, considering the needs of end users, and not substituting technology deployments for well-considered business goals.
NOTE: - These Assignments OR Quiz are just for idea, so kindly don't copy it, after viewing it make your own. Thanks We always try our best to upload 100% correct solution BUT it is requested that you kindly review it before submission, please BEST OF LUCK, Thanks to those students those send me Assignments and quizzes. If you have any Assignment and quiz kindly send at jamilbookcenter@yahoo.com
thanx a lot...........................................
ReplyDelete